'Stop shirking your responsibility': Michael Gove warns 100 potential Tory lockdown rebels to put the country's interests first as it emerges almost the entire nation is to be banned from socialising indoors until APRIL

Michael Gove today warned up to 100 potential Tory rebels to put Britain's interests first after officials admitted last night that almost the entire nation will be banned from socialising indoors until Easter.

The Cabinet Office minister urged MPs to 'take responsibility for difficult decisions' to curb the spread of Covid-19, amid anger from some Conservatives that much of England will face stringent restrictions.

Writing in The Times today, Mr Gove said the decision to impose the restrictions was necessary to 'pull the handbrake' and avoid the 'disaster' of NHS hospitals – and private sector and newly-built Nightingale hospitals – becoming filled to capacity with only Covid patients and emergency cases.

'Keeping our hospitals open, available and effective was not just crucial to dealing with Covid-19. It was imperative for the health of the whole nation,' the pro-shutdown Tory minister argued.

'But the only way to ensure we can take care of cancer patients, administer radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and help stroke victims and treat heart attacks is by protecting the NHS,' he said, adding this could only be done by reducing the spread of the virus and thus limiting the number of Covid patients in hospitals.

Mr Gove also claimed that reducing infections would save the UK economy, which has been decimated by shutdown restrictions that prevent the trade of the hospitality industry and retail, tourism and air travel.

As official forecasts warn that the national debt could soar to £2.8trillion by 2025, he warned: 'Think for a moment what would happen to our economy if we allowed infections to reach such a level that our NHS was overwhelmed.'

But his argument was attacked by former Supreme Court judge Lord Sumption today, who blasted the Government's use of 'extremely selective and tendentious' data to justify shutdowns.

Lord Sumption, last year's BBC Reith Lecturer, also told Radio 4's Today programme that the Tiering system was 'unenforceable' and suggested that the public was growing increasingly unwilling to comply.

It comes ahead of a Commons showdown next week, which could see Boris Johnson lose support from dozens of Tory MPs and be dependent on support from Labour to get the new restrictions approved.

Conservative backbenchers are accusing the Government of risking catastrophic damage to the economy, with one furious MP predicting that as many as 70 MPs would rebel against the measures.

Their anger has been fuelled by reports that it was 'unrealistic' to expect areas under the toughest Covid curbs – Tiers 2 and 3 – to move down to Tier 1 before spring, in a plan dubbed a 'virtual lockdown'.

As the Prime Minister faced one of the most serious backbench uprisings of his premiership:

Have an unhappy Christmas: Government scientists advise no singing, dancing or BOARD GAMES (and isolate for two weeks before and after five-day 'bubble break')

Tis not the season to be jolly... families were last night advised by Government scientists to steer clear of singing, dancing and even board games when they meet up this Christmas.

In bleak midwinter news for those who like to linger over their turkey and trimmings, Britons have also been recommended not to spend too long enjoying their festive dinner.

People should consider using place names to avoid contamination at the dinner table – and be on their guard when it comes to the washing up, says the scientific advisory committee Sage.

And they should consider self-isolating for two weeks both before and after the five-day 'Christmas bubble' break to minimise the risk of spreading the virus.

In a raft of documents yesterday, the scientists warned that any relaxation of restrictions over the festive period could result in a 'large rise' in transmission rates which could ultimately see prevalence of the virus 'easily double'.

The advice was revealed yesterday in documents that were discussed at meetings held between October 29 and earlier this week.

One document, titled Key Evidence and Advice on Celebrations and Observances during Covid-19, said: 'Avoid repeated and extended overnight stays.

'If possible and circumstances allow, self-quarantine for two weeks before and after visit.' It added that maintaining existing 'bubbles' rather than creating new ones could also help.

Responding to Mr Gove's article, Lord Sumption told Radio 4's Today programme: 'There is, in this country, a particular problem... which is the problem about the information that the Government puts out.

'Some of the statistics used to justify the lockdown have been extremely selective and tendentious.

The most serious case recently, which was used to justify the current lockdown, resulted in criticism from the UK's Statistics Authority.'

He added: 'The fact is that the public has become increasingly unwilling to comply for reasons that to me are sound. Of course this is not enforceable. None of these things are enforceable, none of them are, without a strong measure of public willingness to comply.'

He added that 'the fact that the Government cannot send policemen into every one to police it doesn't seem to me to justify locking down ever large numbers of people' who are 'going to suffer no serious ill effects and certainly are not going to die'.

Lord Sumption also pointed out that winter hospitalisations for respiratory diseases always rise and 'in a bad year the NHS habitually cannot cope'.

'But we have never previously regarded that as a reason for making it illegal for people to take risks with their health,' he told the programme.

'It is perfectly true that the example of other countries has given political cover to the Government to take steps that it wouldn't otherwise have taken.'

Meanwhile, fresh data also revealed the disease's 'R' reproduction rate may have dipped below the crucial number of one - meaning the outbreak is shrinking rather than growing.

Senior MPs seized on the news to urge Mr Johnson to halt his proposals for plunging 99 per cent of England into the toughest two lockdown tiers when the current blanket squeeze ends on December 2.

To quell the Tory rebellion, ministers have floated the idea of some rural areas being 'decoupled' from nearby virus hotspots which have dragged them into tougher tiers, according to the Telegraph.

Health Secretary Secretary Matt Hancock is among ministers said to have held talks with backbenchers to offer hope that their constituencies will see an easing of lockdown measures in December.

'My fear is the tiers are going to become like a purgatory with no escape,' said William Wragg, who is chairman of the Commons public administration committee.

'It is vital there is a clear path for areas to emerge from tighter tiered restrictions. We cannot have families, communities and businesses left in limbo.'

Mr Johnson acknowledged people in England felt 'frustrated', particularly in areas with low infection rates that now face tough restrictions. But he refused to adopt a more localised system, saying it was 'too difficult to divide the country up into loads and loads of very complicated sub-divisions'.

MPs will vote on Tuesday on the new system of tiers, which the Government has said it expects to remain in place until the end of March. Once introduced, it will be for ministers to decide whether areas move between the different tiers.

How around 17MILLION people living in parts of England where Covid outbreaks have been shrinking for two weeks or more will STILL be slapped with Tier 2 or 3 rules next week

Around 17million people living in parts of England that have seen their coronavirus outbreaks shrink for at least two weeks in a row will be plunged into the toughest tiers next week when the country's lockdown finally ends, MailOnline's analysis has revealed.

As many as a third of England's authorities - 51 out of 149 - saw coronavirus infections drop in the seven-day spells ending November 15 and November 22 according to Public Health England's weekly surveillance report.

They include all 10 boroughs in Greater Manchester - home to 2.8million alone - and authorities subject to tough restrictions for months, such as Blackburn with Darwen, Gateshead and Lancashire - which are all earmarked for Tier Three.

Boris Johnson has revealed 99 per cent of England will live under toughened restrictions come December 2 - said Tiers would be determined based on the rate of fall in infections, alongside pressure on the NHS, the total number of cases and the rate of infection in the over 60s who are more at risk from the virus.

But officials have refused to reveal the exact criteria needed for areas facing lockdown in all-but-name to escape the tougher curbs, meaning the fate of millions is left in the hands of the secretive Joint Biosecurity Centre, which has previously been slammed as being 'far too opaque'.

Only Cornwall, the Isle of Wight and the Isles of Scilly – 1 per cent of the population – will have the lightest restrictions when the lockdown lifts next week. Everyone else is in Tiers 2 and 3.

The Prime Minister yesterday raised the prospect that some parts of the country could have restrictions eased within weeks as he sought to head off the Tory revolt.

Sir David Amess last night said he expects 'more than 50' fellow Tory MPs will vote against the Government. But scientific advisers have warned that Tier One rules are not strict enough.

Officials expect some areas to shift between Tiers 2 and 3, although this is unlikely before Christmas.

However, a senior source yesterday said it would be 'surprising' if areas in Tier Two saw a big enough fall in rates to move down to Tier One until there is a vaccine.

Government officials have warned that December and January will be the 'most difficult' in the fight against the virus. Covid-19 spreads more easily in winter – at a time when the NHS will also be facing huge pressures and flu season.

'All of those things conspire against being able to relax tiers,' a source said. Former minister Damian Green claimed it was 'irrational' to put whole counties under the harshest restrictions when some towns were barely hit.

He added: 'If people think the restrictions are arbitrary or should not be applied to their area, they are more likely to disobey the rules.'

Former Cabinet minister Sir Iain Duncan Smith told MailOnline Mr Johnson should delay changing tier levels for another two weeks, so the full impact of the national lockdown is clear.

He said: 'Just what the hell are the government doing? I can't believe they haven't waited to see what the figures were doing, and what lockdown was doing.

'The whole thing is on a downward trajectory. This week is the first week in which you see the figures for the lockdown.

'My big question is why are we rushing to take this decision now? Why don't they wait to see what the effect of the lockdown has been?

'They should postpone the final decision on these tiers until they see where we are likely to be... That would allow them to say some of these areas don't need to go into Tier 3 and some of them can go into Tier 1.'

But the PM showed no sign of bowing to the brewing mutiny earlier, insisting while he 'totally understood' why people in low-infection areas were upset about being put under harder restrictions, it was not possible to treat neighbouring places differently.

Speaking on a visit to the Porton Down laboratory site in Wiltshire, Johnson held out the prospect that some areas could see their status downgraded at a review on December 16 – but suggested that was unlikely to mean anyone else going into Tier 1.

Visiting the Porton Down lab on Friday, Boris Johnson admitted the brutal new Tiers are 'frustrating' for low-infection areas - but refused to change course insisting the rules must be kept 'simple'

Mr Johnson said: 'I know it is frustrating for people when they are in a high-tier area when there is very little incidence in their village or their area. I totally understand why people feel frustrated.' He added: 'There really is the prospect of areas being able... to move down the tiering scale.'

Yesterday's infections mark a 20.9 per cent fall on the 20,252 last week and an 8.7 per cent drop from yesterday's 17,555. The seven-day-average number of daily cases – considered a more accurate measurement because it takes into account day-to-day recording fluctuations – is now 16,725, after declining for 12 days in a row.

The 521 deaths announced in the last 24 hours are 1.9 per cent higher than the 511 last Friday and 4.6 per cent above the 498 figure yesterday.

Covid deaths lag two to three weeks behind the infections trend due to the time it takes for people to fall seriously ill with the disease. Experts anticipate deaths will finally start to tail off next month, after the country's second lockdown has ended.

It came as a weekly report by SAGE — Number 10's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies — found the UK's coronavirus 'R' rate may have fallen below the crucial number of one. The group estimates the 'R' is between 0.9 and 1.0 across the whole of the UK, down from between 1.0 and 1.1 last week.

SAGE believes every region in England has an R below one except London and the South East, where it is hovering around the critical number. The R value represents the average number of people each Covid-19 patient passes the disease to and is one of the key indicators of how the virus is spreading. If R is greater than one the epidemic is growing and if it's below one it means the crisis is shrinking.

The UK's coronavirus reproduction rate may have fallen below the crucial number of one (shown left), with SAGE estimating every region in England has an R below one except London and the South East, where it is hovering around the crucial number. A growing number of Tory MPs (listed right) have been openly critical of the government's local lockdown tiers - although some have indicated they plan to abstain in a crunch vote next week rather than oppose the plan outright

HOW HAS THE R RATE CHANGED IN THE UK?

AREA

ENGLAND

---

EAST

LONDON

MIDLANDS

NORTH EAST

NORTH WEST

SOUTH EAST

SOUTH WEST

THIS WEEK

0.9 - 1.0

---

0.9 - 1.1

1.0 - 1.1

0.9 - 1.1

0.8 - 1.0

0.7 - 0.9

1.0 - 1.2

0.9 - 1.1

LAST WEEK

1.0 - 1.1

---

1.0 - 1.3

1.0 - 1.2

1.0 - 1.1

0.8 - 1.0

1.1 - 1.3

1.0 - 1.3

Just THREE local areas saw Covid rates rise last week

Only three local authorities in England saw their coronavirus infection rates rise last week, official data showed- even though 99 per cent of the country will be plunged into Tier Two or Three lockdowns next week.

And more than half - 97 out of 149 - saw their numbers of Covid cases plummet by at least 25 per cent, according to Public Health England's weekly infection surveillance report.

Medway, East Sussex and Redbridge, in London, were the three authorities to see rises in Covid-19 infections, by 28.4 per cent, 5.2 per cent and 5 per cent, respectively, as lockdown restrictions entered their third week.

Department of Health officials claim the percentage change in Covid infection rates was used as a key criteria for determining the tiers, alongside pressure on the local NHS, total infection levels, cases in over 60s and proportion of tests that are positive for Covid-19.

But figures back up claims from furious MPs and some scientists that ministers - who have refused to reveal what the exact thresholds are for placing restrictions on certain areas - should have placed more local authorities into looser tiers because of rapidly tumbling infections.

Experts said they felt ministers had been 'cautious' in applying tiers because of an expected spike over Christmas but that, once the festive period was past, it was likely many areas would be moved to Tier Two.

It comes after the Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick suggested that local authorities could be shifted down to Tier Two before Christmas, providing their case rates fell to low levels. And Boris Johnson admitted the brutal new Tiers are 'frustrating' for low-infection areas - but refused to change course insisting the rules must be kept 'simple'.

And showing the second coronavirus wave has already peaked, the Cambridge University academics behind the gloomy 4,000 deaths-a-day estimate that spooked ministers into imposing a second national lockdown in the first place have revised their model to say that cases across England started declining last month.

It marks the first time the R has been below one since the week up to September 4, before the second wave took off when universities and schools went back later that month. The fact the disease is already in retreat will raise more questions about whether it is necessary to slap 99 per cent of people in England with tough lockdown Tiers from next Wednesday. Number 10 and its scientists insist the draconian curbs are needed to limit the damage done when lockdown is relaxed for five days over Christmas.

It's possible England's R rate is even lower than Friday's estimate because SAGE's modelling lags by about two to three weeks and the full effects of lockdown have only started to trickle through. The group uses hospitalisation and death rates to give a more accurate estimate, and it takes weeks for Covid-19 patients to fall seriously ill after catching the virus.

The estimates for R and growth rate are provided by the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling (SPI-M), a subgroup of SAGE. The growth rate for the UK, which estimates how quickly the number of infections is changing day by day, is between minus 2 per cent and zero.

The most likely value is towards the middle of that range, experts advising the Government say. SAGE has also said that a divergence in policies across the four nations that constitute the UK mean 'the estimate of R for the entire UK has become less meaningful in recent weeks'.

The experts said the impact of the lockdown measures introduced in England on November 5 are beginning to be observed this week and cannot yet be fully evaluated. But they estimate that R for England may continue to decline and 'may be below 1 for all regions already'.

Professor Mark Woolhouse, an epidemiologist at the University of Edinburgh, said last night: 'It is encouraging news that the R numbers across the UK are now below one, and may decrease further as the full impact of lockdown becomes apparent.'

He pointed out R has dropped from a high of up to 1.6 on 2 October – suggesting changes made in September were having an impact.

' may indicate that measures taken during that month did have some impact in some regions of the UK,' he said. 'It is very difficult to tease out the impact of several different measures introduced in quick succession.

'However, these data do raise the question of whether the earlier implementation of measures short of full lockdown would have been sufficient to keep the epidemic in check and prevent local NHS trusts from being overwhelmed.'

But Professor Liam Smeeth of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine said lockdown has clearly had the desired effect.

'It is increasingly clear that the stricter measures implemented in recent weeks are having an impact,' he said.

'Infections were rising rapidly – and everything we know, including direct experience from the first wave – tells us that infections would have carried on rising and would still be rising now. The collective actions of society have quite literally reshaped the pandemic. Working together we have been able to control this virus.'

He added: 'If all goes well, within a few months we are very likely to have vaccinated the older population, care home residents and people with serious underlying illnesses that place them at high risk from Covid-19.

'Even if the virus continues to circulate at the high levels we were seeing in March or October 2020, hospitalisations and death rates from Covid-19 will be nowhere near the previous levels.

'The very real fear of the NHS being overwhelmed by severe Covid-19 will recede.'

Royal Stoke University Hospital has declared a major incident after there was a rise in coronavirus patient admissions leaving only seven ventilators free in their critical care unit.

The hospital increased its alert level as 38 of its 322 Covid patients are on machines and struck a deal with NHS trusts n Birmingham, Coventry and Warwickshire to transfer patients.

Earlier, Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick said there was 'every reason to believe' the restrictions can be loosened in some places over the coming weeks - despite MPs having been told by other ministers there is little chance of that happening before January.

HOW CLOSE IS YOUR AREA TO MOVING UP OR DOWN THE COVID TIERS?

An official graph laying out coronavirus outbreaks across the country suggests there are parts of the North of England that could be 'de-escalated' in January.

The chart, published by Public Health England, shows that some parts of the country are seeing the fastest falls in infection rate and health bosses are monitoring their 'continued improvement'.

Although much of the north of the country and the Midlands will end up in the toughest Tier Three rules when lockdown ends next Thursday, many areas may be on the way to seeing rules loosened.

Nottinghamshire and Warwickshire are already close to dropping into Tier Two thanks to falling infection rates, the graphic suggests, with them appearing closer to the yellow Tier Two group than they do to Tier Three in red. Stratford upon Avon, was one place that caused uproar when it was revealed to be in the toughest restrictions, because the infection rate there is only around half of the national average.

And the graphic shows rapid declines in cases in South Yorkshire, Lancashire and Derbyshire could stand them in good stead in the coming weeks.

PHE's report said: 'This chart shows some decreases in weekly case rates in the north of England, and other areas where case rates are high but declining. Continued improvement over the coming period may make these areas candidates for de-escalation in the New Year.'

Meanwhile, Suffolk is one of the least affected areas in Tier Two and it could even be on course to enter the coveted Tier One, currently only afford to Cornwall and the Isle of Wight.

A row broke out last night over the Government's tiering decisions as MPs and members of the public in many Tier Three areas were outraged at having to face the harshest rules despite relatively low or improving infection rates.

Hospitality chiefs say three quarters of pubs and restaurants will be made 'unviable' by the draconian rules after the blanket national lockdown ends on December 2, which will leave 32million people in Tier 2 and 23million in Tier 3.

Rural places such as the village of Penshurst in Kent – which has had only three cases in the past week – have been plunged into Tier 3 because they fall under a local authority with high infection rates.

In a round of interviews on Friday, Mr Jenrick tried to cool tensions by stressing that there will be a review of the Tier allocations on December 16, and they will then be looked at again every week.

'It is possible. There will be a review point in 14 days' time, around December 16. At that point we – advised by the experts – will look at each local authority area and see whether there is potential to move down the tiers,' he told Sky News.

However, MPs have told MailOnline that health minister Helen Whately said on a conference call that there was little chance of any changes to the allocations before January. And government sources told the Times that it would need to wait until the impact of the 'Christmas Bubble' relaxation had become clear.

SAGE experts also cast doubt on the idea of shifts in two weeks, warning that would not be long enough to judge what impact the measures were having.

One Tory MP told MailOnline: 'I think the plan needs to be a lot more nuanced and it needs to be looked at again.

'A lot of people are saying they are in a particular county that is not badly affected but they are being penalised because of a town with a high infection rate at the other end of the county.'

The MP said Mr Johnson needs to prove the tiers are 'absolutely essential' by publishing all of his evidence.

They said: 'If you are constraining people's liberties you have to come up with very cogent evidence.'

Sir Graham Brady, the chairman of the 1922 Committee of Tory MPs, said: 'My concerns are two-fold; the first is that the restrictions in Tiers 2 and 3 are a massive restriction of people's fundamental human rights: telling them when they can see their children, their grandchildren, preventing people from meeting their partners, and stopping people from visiting vulnerable relatives in care homes.

'Secondly, the tiers have been applied in an unjust and unfair way – putting whole counties into lockdown when significant areas have very low levels of infection.'

Shipley MP Philip Davies told his local Telegraph & Argus he would be voting against the plans.

'I'm not surprised. I was pretty sure that's what the outcome would be,' he said.

'That does not make me any less angry about it. I am absolutely furious about it, to be perfectly honest.'

Mr Jenrick said the places that could be moved down at the next review point were those that had been 'finely balanced' when decisions were made this week.

'There were a number of places which were quite finely balanced judgments where they were on the cusp of different tiers. Those are the places that are more likely to be in that position,' he said.

'We have also got to bear in mind that there will be an opening over the Christmas period which is likely to drive some higher rate of infection if some people choose to go and meet family and friends on Christmas Day and the days surrounding it.

'Our overall approach is trying to insure the tiers hold the line and that places are in a process of de-escalation. What we don't want to do is ease up too quickly and then find that in January we are having to put tiers back in place again.

'But there is every reason to believe that places could see a change at December 16-17 time.'

Speaking at a No 10 press conference last night after being released from a fortnight of isolation, Mr Johnson acknowledged the UK faced a 'hard winter', and apologised to the hospitality sector.

He said the second lockdown had worked to bring the pandemic under control, but added: 'If we ease off now, we risk losing control of this virus all over again, casting aside our hard won gains, and forcing us back into a New Year national lockdown with all the damage that would mean.'

Mr Johnson denied that the tough new restrictions amounted to lockdown by the back door, pointing out that shops, hairdressers and gyms can reopen in all three tiers from December 2.

He insisted that communities stuck in the highest tiers could move down to a more relaxed regime if case numbers fell, adding: 'Your tier is not your destiny.'

But he was undermined by Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty who said it was likely to be 'months' before a significant part of the country is able to go into the lowest tier.

Rural places such as the village of Penshurst in Kent – which has had only three cases in the past week – have been plunged into Tier Three because they fall under a local authority with high infection rates

PM 'overruled Gove' to put London in Tier 2

Boris Johnson overruled Michael Gove's call for London to be placed under the harshest coronavirus lockdown after lobbying from Tory MPs, it was claimed on Friday.

The capital was put in Tier 2 when the allocations were announced, giving some relief to the battered economy and hospitality industry.

However, Matt Hancock made clear it had been a borderline decision, and warned there was a 'lot of work to do' for it to stay in the lower bracket.

Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove, regarded as a leading 'Dove' in the top ranks of government, is believed to have pushed for London to be in the harshest bracket at a key meeting on Wednesday. But Mr Johnson - a former mayor of the city - went against his judgement, according to the Telegraph.

Neighbouring Kent has been moved into Tier 3, despite anger that it includes many areas with low infection rates.

Sources close to Mr Gove refused to comment on discussions at the 'Covid O' Cabinet committee on Wednesday - although they did not deny he had suggested London should be in Tier 3.

Downing Street has denied the verdict on London was affected by economic or political concerns.

But in the run-up to the Tier allocations, Tory MPs and mayoral candidate Shaun Bailey had demanded it was placed into Tier 2. Many called for the city to be treated on a borough by borough basis.

Ex-minister Tobias Ellwood demanded that the government use more up-to-date data to make decisions, as well as considering options such as limits on travelling around the country.

Suggesting he will abstain next week, the Bournemouth MP told BBC Breakfast: 'My biggest gripe I think is the data that we are using. They made a decision on November 25 using last week's data for the vote that is going to happen next week.

'I would really like the decisions to be made using up-to-date data a couple of days before these new restrictions come in.

'I would also go further than that to say, I would have liked to have seen a blanket order across the country of a travel ban of maybe up to 10 to 15 miles so that areas that are in Tier 1 are better protected and areas that are in Tier 3 can be better targeted with support.

'The fact is people can still move around an awful lot and I'm afraid the virus still has the ability to move.'

Former Cabinet minister Damian Green, whose Kent constituency has been placed in the top Tier Three despite a relatively low case rate, predicted a widespread revolt by Tory MPs next week.

'The Government are in more trouble than they realise,' he said. 'These decisions have enraged a lot of the Tory heartlands, as well as a lot of our newly-won constituencies in the North and Midlands.

'You could be looking at the biggest rebellion of this Parliament.'

However, SAGE member Professor John Edmunds said they will have had little chance to assess how well the new tiered controls were working when they come up for the first 14-day review in mid-December.

'I think that is quite an early time to be able to see what the effect has been. I think we will still be seeing the effect of the lockdown at that point in time,' he told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.

'For me I think that is quite an early review stage. I can't imagine there will be huge changes at that point just simply because I don't think we will have accumulated much data by then.'

The decision left almost all of England in the top two tiers. The tough new system will replace the lockdown on December 2 and is due to stay until April.

Figures showed just 713,573 people will be placed in Tier One – equal to 1.3 per cent of the population. By comparison, 42 per cent of England was in Tier One before the month-long lockdown.

A decision that's unfit for a Queen

Hever in Kent was in Tier One before the country was plunged into lockdown. But despite having under three cases in the last week, it will re-emerge in Tier Three. Duncan Leslie, chief executive of Hever Castle , Anne Boleyn's childhood home, said the decision was particularly 'galling' when infection rates are higher in neighbouring villages in Surrey and Sussex which are in Tier Two

Hever in Kent was in Tier One before the country was plunged into lockdown. But despite having under three cases in the last week, it will re-emerge in Tier Three.

Laura Palmer, of Hever Residents' Association, said the decision was a blow for a village so small that it has no shops or pavements where residents could catch the virus from each other.

Duncan Leslie, chief executive of Hever Castle, Anne Boleyn's childhood home, said the decision was particularly 'galling' when infection rates are higher in neighbouring villages in Surrey and Sussex which are in Tier Two.

Mr Leslie, 51, warned the castle, pictured – a huge tourist attraction which employs many villagers – will make a seven-figure loss this year.

Meanwhile, David Brant, landlord of the King Henry VIII pub, said: 'All you can do is plan for it to be Tier One or Two, then when it's Tier Three it's horrible because you plan for the best case.'

Mr Brant, 40, added that his diary was 'rammed' with Christmas bookings that will now have to be cancelled.

Residents of Great Torrington who have faithfully complied with two national lockdowns find themselves marooned in Tier Two. This means friends cannot meet indoors, and pubs must stay shut unless they serve meals

Tarka the Otter town dead in the water

Great Torrington isn't just the setting for children's classic Tarka the Otter. The north Devon market town has also been hailed as the healthiest place in Britain.

A study last year praised its low levels of pollution and good access to NHS services. A lot has changed since then, of course – but Great Torrington, pictured, remains in relatively good health.

For most of this year there have been fewer than three cases of coronavirus there each week. That number rose to six in the second week of November, then dropped to five in the third week, for a rate of just 83 infections per 100,000.

Despite these encouraging figures, residents who have faithfully complied with two national lockdowns find themselves marooned in Tier Two. This means friends cannot meet indoors, and pubs must stay shut unless they serve meals.

Waitress Keeley Allin fears for her job at the Market Cafe. 'We're not going to be allowed to serve mixed households indoors. A lot of our trade is based on that. We will be open next week but we really have no idea how many customers we'll get.' The 24-year-old – who also happens to be the town's mayor – warned that pubs would suffer the most. 'Some will remain closed and you do wonder whether they will ever reopen... it's very sad.'

Brian and Vicky Conrad, who set up their own guitar shop three months ago, fear Tier Two status will put off customers from travelling into the town centre.

'All this time we've earned nothing,' Mr Conrad said. 'Big online retailers have scooped everything up and I fear this latest blow will destroy us.'

Mr Conrad, 51, decided to try selling guitars after the pandemic brought his career as an IT consultant to an abrupt end in March. 'We've had a reasonable grant from the Government,' he said. 'It has kept us going through what should have been our best trading period. But we are now suffering the fallout because the Government didn't respond properly in the first place.'

Mrs Conrad, 49, said: 'It is just so sad. We felt we'd done everything right and were trying to find a new way to make a living. Now we are dead in the water.'

The market town of Bourne had been living under the relative freedom of Tier One restrictions before the second lockdown

The Bourne absurdity

The market town of Bourne had been living under the relative freedom of Tier One restrictions before the second lockdown.

And its population of around 14,000 saw only 21 new coronavirus cases last week.

But business owners and councillors in the Lincolnshire town were left horrified by the news that they will be moving into Tier Three next month.

The area, pictured above, is known for its natural springs and agriculture. It faces the same measures as the rest of the county which has high case numbers in the north.

However, Bourne locals point out they are just a few miles from Peterborough which has higher infection numbers per 100,000 yet will be in Tier Two when the country escapes lockdown.

Town councillor Brenda Johnson said: 'Bourne is going to suffer for this, it's absolutely crazy.'

The end of Lockdown 2.0 next week should have been a cause for celebration. But any sense of relief will have evaporated at the advent of the new localised system of tiers, says Sir Graham Brady

SIR GRAHAM BRADY: This is destroying Britain... I'll be voting AGAINST the new Tier system

Commentary by SIR GRAHAM BRADY for the Daily Mail

The end of Lockdown 2.0 next week should have been a cause for celebration. But any sense of relief will have evaporated at the advent of the new localised system of tiers.

In practice, the new regime is just as heavy-handed as lockdown, leaving 99 per cent of the population under arbitrary state control.

Riddled with contradictions and unsupported by compelling scientific evidence, these restrictions will cause immense further damage to the economy, cripple our civil liberties and worsen the nation's health. In short, they threaten to destroy the social fabric that makes up Great Britain.

That is why I shall be voting against their implementation when Parliament decides on the issue on Tuesday. I will do so with regret, because I know the Government faces agonising choices in the handling of Covid-19. Indeed, in this crisis there are no easy decisions and the Cabinet has been grappling with an unprecedented challenge. Nevertheless, like many of my Conservative colleagues, I cannot lend my backing to this policy, which I fear will do more harm than good.

For a start, it represents a continuation of the authoritarian attack on fundamental human rights which we in Britain have taken for granted for centuries.

In the name of public health, essential freedoms are being drastically eroded, with officialdom now telling us with whom we can socialise and even have sex. If anyone had predicted last year that in December 2020 grannies could be barred by bureaucratic edict from hugging their grandchildren, such a claim would have been greeted with snorts of derision.

But that is what has happened in Covid-scarred Britain.

Like citizens in the former Soviet bloc, we find that our freedoms to travel abroad, and even move within our own country, have been drastically curtailed.

Our long-standing British tradition has always been that the people tell the state what it is allowed to do. But now that relationship has been completely inverted, with the public fully accountable to the state. The Government's response to the coronavirus has badly undermined common sense. Faith in the judgement of ordinary citizens has been replaced by endless coercion and instruction by the authorities.

In parts of the north of England and the Midlands, residents have had to put up with some form of lockdown for no less than eight months – apart from a brief spell of relief in July.

Now, after a month of national restrictions that were sold to us as a necessary solution, they find themselves in the same – if not a worse – position than they were in at the beginning of November. The issue is that the mechanics of the tiers are dubious. They have been constructed on the wide basis of counties rather than boroughs, giving rise to glaring inconsistencies.

My own constituency of Altrincham and Sale West is a classic example of this lack of flexibility.

Even though our rate of infection is far lower than the English national average, we have been placed in Tier Three because we are lumped in with Greater Manchester.

If we had been part of Cheshire – as historically Altrincham was until the 1970s – we would have been in Tier Two. What makes our classification even more absurd is that infection rates are actually falling dramatically across Greater Manchester.

Indeed, there is a distinct lack of data to justify these tiers, and the same story of geographical illogicalites can be found throughout the country.

For all the claims about 'following the science', there has been a worrying absence of hard evidence behind many of the authorities' actions throughout the Covid crisis.

After all, it hardly says much for the effectiveness of the current lockdown that 61 per cent of England's population – 34.1 million people – will come out of it in a higher tier than before.

Moreover, the plethora of rules often seem dangerously counterproductive. In Tier Three, there is a blanket ban on the opening of bars, cafes, restaurants and pubs for anything except takeaways – even though the owners may have spent a fortune on making such places Covid-secure. As a result, people will end up mixing in environments where the virus is much more easily spread, such as private homes.

In fact, there seems little rationale about the way the hospitality trade has been singled out for punishment, given that pubs and restaurants account for only 2 per cent of Covid transmissions.

At a time when unemployment, public debts and business failures are soaring – as the Chancellor Rishi Sunak set out in the starkest possible terms in his spending review statement this week – these new tiers will only wreak further havoc with the state's finances and hopes of recovery.

And that's to say nothing of the nation's mental health, which is being stretched to breaking point by the depressing cycle of lockdown and oppression.

Yes, the fight against Covid is an epic struggle and we all have to take responsibility to protect ourselves and others. But this is not the way we are meant to live in a once-open, prosperous democracy.

NowMyNews

Search This Blog