Labour accuses government of putting public safety 'at risk' after Home Office accidentally deleted 150,000 fingerprint, DNA and arrest records from national police database during weekly data purge
Labour has launched a blistering attack on 'this shambolic Government' after a massive data loss from police records.
The Home Office accidentally deleted 150,000 fingerprint, DNA and arrest records from a national police database during a weekly data purge.
Minister for Policing, Kit Malthouse, blamed 'human error' for the data wipe that has thrown the UK visa system into chaos.
Shadow home secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds demanded urgent answers from Priti Patel and accused ministers of jeopardising public safety.
He said in a statement: 'The Home Secretary must take responsibility for this serious problem.
'She must – urgently – make a statement about what has gone wrong, the extent of the issue, and what action is being taken to reassure the public. Answers must be given.
'This is an extraordinarily serious security breach that presents huge dangers for public safety.
'The incompetence of this shambolic Government cannot be allowed to put people at risk, let criminals go free and deny victims justice.'
The history records were deleted in a technological blunder and could reportedly allow offenders to go free (file photo of police detaining a lockdown protestor on January 9)
Labour's Shadow Home Secretary has called on Priti Patel (pictured above, on January 12) to take responsibility for the blunder and provide clarity over its impact
Labour demands statement from Priti Patel after police data is accidentally wiped
Labour is demanding answers from Home Secretary Priti Patel after 150,000 arrest records were accidentally wiped from police databases last week.
Shadow Home Secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds said in a statement: 'The Home Secretary must take responsibility for this serious problem.
'She must – urgently – make a statement about what has gone wrong, the extent of the issue, and what action is being taken to reassure the public. Answers must be given.
'This is an extraordinarily serious security breach that presents huge dangers for public safety.
'The incompetence of this shambolic Government cannot be allowed to put people at risk, let criminals go free and deny victims justice.'
Speaking earlier, MR Malthouse said: 'Some defective code was introduced as part of that routine maintenance earlier this week and that's resulted in a deletion of some records and that's currently under investigation.'
The blunder could allow offenders to go free as evidence from crime scenes will not be flagged on the Police National Computer , reported The Times.
A Home Office statement revealed it was working with police to 'assess the impact' of the glitch, which reportedly occurred by accident during a weekly 'weeding' session to expunge data.
The Home Office said no records of criminals or dangerous persons had been deleted, and that the wiped records were those of people arrested and released when no further action was taken.
However, the omissions would appear to at least impinge on police power to reopen investigations should more evidence come to light in certain cases.
The Times said 'crucial intelligence about suspects' had vanished because of the blunder, and that Britain's visa system was thrown into disarray, with the processing of applications having been suspended for two days.
The Home Office statement said: 'The technical issue with the Police National Computer has been resolved, and we are working at pace with law enforcement partners to assess its impact.
'The issue related to people arrested and released where no further action had been taken and no records of criminal or dangerous persons have been deleted. No further records can be deleted.'
The Home Office is understood to believe there have been no risks concerning visa processing.
Susan Hall, a specialist in data protection and partner with national law firm Clarke Willmott LLP, told MailOnline: 'While any personal data loss on this scale is bad, the loss of fingerprint, DNA and arrest history records from the Police National Computer is shocking.
'Data surrounding investigation and prosecution of crime forms a specific type of data which means the holder has a particular duty in the way they store and handle it.
'Despite the Home Office framing the loss of this data as 'no biggie', it is in fact a very serious incident and casts profound doubt on the culture of data management in the organisation as a whole; accidental mass deletions should not occur if the principles of data protection by design and data protection by default are being upheld.
'People who hold data, particularly this kind of data, are under express duties to hold it securely and retain it for no longer than necessary.
'If indeed the deletion of these 150,000 records is a minor incident, as they would like us to believe, then the question is raised around whether that data should have been held in the first place. Either way the error is a very bad example to set.'
The Home Office (pictured above) said in a statement it was working with police to 'assess the impact' of the glitch, which reportedly occurred by accident during a weekly 'weeding' session
Mr Malthouse, said: 'Earlier this week, a standard housekeeping process that runs on the Police National Computer deleted a number of records in error.
'A fast time review has identified the problem and corrected the process so it cannot happen again. The Home Office, NPCC and other law enforcement partners are working at pace to recover the data.
'While the loss relates to individuals who were arrested and then released with no further action, I have asked officials and the police to confirm their initial assessment that there is no threat to public safety.
'I will provide further updates as we conclude our work.'
According to a letter to police chiefs later leaked to the newspaper, 213,000 offence records, 175,000 arrest records and 15,000 person records have potentially been deleted in error from the system.
There may be an overlap of information between the records as a suspect's record could relate to multiple offences.
Naveed Malik, who leads the National Police Chiefs' Council work on the PNC, is said to have told police chief constables and police and crime commissioners around 26,000 DNA records relating to 21,710 people had potentially been deleted in error, alongside a further 30,000 fingerprint records and 600 subject records.
The letter reportedly says the deleted DNA records included some that had 'previously been marked for indefinite retention following conviction of serious offences'.
It added: 'We are aware of a couple of instances of 'near misses' for serious crimes where a biometric match to an offender was not generated as expected but the offender was identified through matches between scenes.
'However, in these circumstances, without a direct match report to the subject, it may be more challenging for police to progress to an interview or arrest.'
The history of Government data losses and breaches - including more than 4,000 incidents recorded by the Home Office between 2019 and 2020
The Home Office had a total of 4,204 data loss incidents between 2019 and 2020, according to figures compiled by think tank Parliament Street.
This number is over double - a 120 per cent rise - that of the previous year, with 1,895 data loss incidents recorded by the Home Office in 2018-19.
Among the incidents recorded in 2019-20, 25 were noted as being particularly severe with the Information Commissioner's Office having to be alerted.
Other major data losses suffered by the Government include the data discs of 25million individuals and 7.25million families claiming child benefit, including their name, address, date of birth and, in some cases, bank details, in 2007.
A former Home Office employee told The Guardian in 2018 that thousands of landing cards documenting Windrush immigrants' arrival dates in the UK were destroyed.
The government department also apologised in 2019 after a data blunder exposed the email addresses of people interested in the Windrush compensation scheme.
An 'administrative error' meant messages sent to some individuals and organisations who had asked to be kept informed about the scheme included other recipients' addresses.