Skip to main content

Biden says the US didn't evacuate Afghan civilians sooner because they DIDN'T want to leave and admits the Taliban takeover was 'quicker than anticipated'

President Biden said in his first remarks since chaos erupted in Afghanistan that the US hadn't evacuated Afghan civilian allies sooner because they 'didn't want to leave,' but at the same time admitted he had not expected the Taliban to take over so soon. 

'I know there are concerns about why we did not begin evacuating Afghan civilians sooner,' Biden said in an 18-minute address. 

'Part of the answer is some of the Afghans did not want to leave earlier still hopeful for their country. Part of it was because the Afghan government and its supporters discouraged us from organizing a mass exodus to avoid triggering, as they said, a crisis of confidence.'

Some took issue with Biden's assertion that Afghani civilians who had helped the US didn't want to leave sooner, noting the onerous visa process interpreters have been forced to undergo with Taliban targets on their back.  

Over the past two weeks, only 2,000 SIV holders have made their way to the US.

As many 9,000 translators and 40,000 family members have been waiting to hear when they are going to be evacuated, according to Peter Miervaldis, board chairman of No One Left Behind, a non-profit that works to relocate foreign interpreters for the US.

'I adamantly disagree with the President's assertion that some SIV recipients wanted to stay in Afghanistan,' Miervaldis told DailyMail.com.

Meanwhile, the Department of Defense is preparing to potentially relocate up to 30,000 Afghan SIV applicants into the US and move them into housing on military bases while they're being vetted, according to documents obtained by Fox News.    

Hours before Biden's address, heartbreaking footage showed Afghanis surging the airfield at Hamid Karzai International Airport and launching themselves in front of a US military aircraft taxiing on the runway.

Three stowaways plunged to their death as the plane went airborne and US service members fired shots killing two civilians as unrest broke out at the airport. 

Footage from Hamad Karzai airport showed hundreds of people running alongside - and in front of - a US Air Force plane preparing to take off

Footage from Hamad Karzai airport showed hundreds of people running alongside - and in front of - a US Air Force plane preparing to take off

And though the president conceded the fall of Kabul and Taliban takeover had occurred far more quickly than US intelligence predicted, he said he did not regret the US' strategy for troop withdrawal.

'I stand squarely behind my decision,' Biden said. 'After 20 years I've learned the hard way. That there was never a good time to withdraw U.S. forces.' 

It was the first time the president had spoken publicly about the unfolding crisis in six days. He was forced to emerge from Camp David amid hostile headlines about his absence from Washington while Americans were being rescued from Kabul airport, but left Washington and returned to the retreat immediately after. 

The president said he wanted to be 'straight' with the American public. 

'The truth is - this did unfold more quickly than we had anticipated,' he said, his eyes narrow as he made clear who was to blame.

'So what's happened? Afghanistan's political leaders gave up and fled the country.  

'The Afghan military collapsed, sometimes without trying to fight.' 

Biden also pointed a finger at former President Donald Trump's agreement with the Taliban to pull out American troops by May 1, 2021. 

'So I'm left again to ask of those who argue that we should stay: How many more generations of America's daughters and sons would you have me send to fight Afghanistan's civil war, when Afghan troops will not?' Biden said. 

President Joe Biden defended leaving Afghanistan during remarks at the White House Monday, saying he had learned there was never a good time to withdraw U.S. forces

President Joe Biden defended leaving Afghanistan during remarks at the White House Monday, saying he had learned there was never a good time to withdraw U.S. forces

Biden spoke for about 18 minutes in the East Room of the White House and then left without taking questions. It marked the first time he had spoken publicly about Afghanistan in six days

Biden spoke for about 18 minutes in the East Room of the White House and then left without taking questions. It marked the first time he had spoken publicly about Afghanistan in six days

Afghans climb on top of a passenger jet at Kabul's airport amid chaotic scenes as civilians try to find safe passage out of the Afghan capital after Taliban takeover

Afghans climb on top of a passenger jet at Kabul's airport amid chaotic scenes as civilians try to find safe passage out of the Afghan capital after Taliban takeover

 'How many more lives, American lives is it worth? How many endless rows of head stones at Arlington National Cemetery?' 

'I'm clear in my answer: I will not repeat the mistakes we've made in the past. The mistake of staying and fighting indefinitely in a conflict that is not in the national interest of the United States,' he continued. 

'Of doubling down on a civil war in a foreign country. Of attempting to remake a country through the endless military deployments of U.S. forces,' the president added. 

His speech lasted about 18 minutes and he walked briskly out of the East Room, ignoring reporters' shouted questions. 

The president landed at Fort McNair in Washington, D.C. a little after 1 p.m., ahead of his remarks. He took no questions as he walked by reporters to the waiting motorcade. 

Biden was originally supposed to stay at Camp David until Wednesday as part of an August vacation.   

But the unfolding pace of events forced him to return. 

At least eight people were killed during chaos at the Kabul airport on Monday, as thousands of Afghans traveled to the airfield in hopes of escaping the Taliban. 

Two of those killed were armed Afghans shot dead by US troops. 

Another three were run over by taxiing jets. An additional three were stowaways who fell from the engines of a US Air Force jet as it took off. 

Meanwhile, Taliban fighters are going door to door to find Afghan special forces who fought alongside the U.S., Fox News reported.  

President Joe Biden is captured landing at Fort McNair after cutting his trip to Camp David short to return to Washington and deliver remarks on Afghanistan

President Joe Biden is captured landing at Fort McNair after cutting his trip to Camp David short to return to Washington and deliver remarks on Afghanistan

President Joe Biden meets virtually with national security advisers from Camp David where he was supposed to spend part of his August vacation

President Joe Biden meets virtually with national security advisers from Camp David where he was supposed to spend part of his August vacation 

The Taliban seized nearly all of Afghanistan in just over a week, despite the billions of dollars spent by the US and NATO over nearly two decades to build up Afghan security forces

The Taliban seized nearly all of Afghanistan in just over a week, despite the billions of dollars spent by the US and NATO over nearly two decades to build up Afghan security forces

A day earlier President Ashraf Ghani flew out of the country.

The result is an unfolding humanitarian catastrophe and questions about how a president who trumpeted his foreign experience during last year's campaign could have got things so wrong. 

Shortly before his arrival back in Washington, the White House sent out a statement saying Biden was being updated with reports from the Kabul airport, where eight people have reportedly been killed as American forces oversee evacuation efforts. 

'This morning, the President was briefed by his national security team, including the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman Milley, on the security situation at Hamid Karzai International Airport, and ongoing efforts to safely evacuate American citizens, US Embassy personnel and local staff, SIV applicants and their families, and other vulnerable Afghans,' it said.    

Email enquiries sent to White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki over the weekend received an automated out-of-office response saying she would return on Aug. 22. 

While U.S. military planes flew in an out of Kabul airport to rescue American nationals, it was left to National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan to defend Biden's decision for a rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan. 

Sullivan said staying longer would not have changed the overall outcome but was vague about when the nation might hear from its commander in chief. 

'They can expect to hear from the president soon. He's right now actively engaged with his national security team,' he told Good Morning America.  

'He is working the situation hard. 

'He is focused on ensuring the mission which is to secure that airport and continue these evacuations that that mission continues and brought to a positive conclusion. He's deeply engaged on it. 

'At the right point he will address the American people.'

After Sullivan's appearance, the White House pushed out updated guidance announcing the president would return to Washington. 

Except for statements, Biden hasn't publicly commented on Afghanistan in six days. 

'They've got to fight for themselves, fight for their nation,' Biden said Tuesday of Afghan forces. 'They've got to want to fight.' 

At the time, the president said he didn't regret his decision.  

National Security Adviser said the nation would hear from President Biden 'at the right point' as criticism mounts of his decision to stay away from Washington amid deepening crisis

National Security Adviser said the nation would hear from President Biden 'at the right point' as criticism mounts of his decision to stay away from Washington amid deepening crisis

Leading up to Biden's White House return, former President Donald Trump mocked the president's absence.

'The outcome in Afghanistan would have been totally different if the Trump Administration had been in charge,' he said in an emailed statement.

'Who or what will Joe Biden surrender to next?

'Someone should ask him, if they can find him.'  

On Monday, Sullivan admitted that the administration was surprised at how quickly Kabul had fallen.  

'It is certainly the case that the speed with which cities fell was much greater than anyone anticipated,' he told NBC's Today show.

Like other officials, he tried to distance the Biden administration from the collapse, blaming Afghanistan's government and armed forces and said staying longer would have made little difference.

Taliban fighters stand guard on the road to the Hamid Karzai International Airport, in Kabul, Afghanistan, Monday, Aug. 16, 2021.

Taliban fighters stand guard on the road to the Hamid Karzai International Airport, in Kabul, Afghanistan, Monday, Aug. 16, 2021.

Afghans crowd on to the apron at Kabul airport as they try to flee the country

Afghans crowd on to the apron at Kabul airport as they try to flee the country

'Part of the reason for that... is because at the end of the day, despite the fact that we spent 20 years and tens of billions of dollars to get the best equipment, the best training and the best capacity to the national Afghan security forces, we could not give them the will,' he said.  

Biden, he also said, was ready to work with other leaders in trying to protect Afghans.

'He is prepared to marshal the international community on this issue. He cares passionately about these human rights questions, and we will stay focused on them in the period ahead,' he said. 

'But that was not a reason for the United States to enter a third decade of war in the middle of an internal conflict in another country.'

Talking points given to Democratic lawmakers made the same argument. 

'The president was not willing to enter a third decade of conflict and surge in thousands of more troops to fight in a civil war that Afghanistan wouldn't fight for themselves,' a memo said. 

It also added, 'The administration knew that there was a distinct possibility that Kabul would fall to the Taliban.' 

'It was not an inevitability. It was a possibility,' the document said. 

It also said 'indefinite war was and is unacceptable to the president.' 

Republicans laid the blame squarely with Biden.

In a joint statement, three former security officials in the Trump administration said withdrawal was the right decision but had been badly botched.

'The difference between then and now is leadership,' said Lt. General (Ret.) Keith Kellogg, former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, and former Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf. 

'The Biden Administration alone owns this failure, adding Afghanistan to Biden's long history of, as President Obama's Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said, being "wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades."'

Rep. Liz Cheney called the situation in Afghanistan 'catastrophic' because it could breed the same terrorist threat the country presented 20 years ago when it became the staging ground for 9/11

Rep. Liz Cheney called the situation in Afghanistan 'catastrophic' because it could breed the same terrorist threat the country presented 20 years ago when it became the staging ground for 9/11

Rep. Liz Cheney, whose father Vice President Dick Cheney helped the U.S. launch the Afghanistan war, ultimately blamed Democratic President Joe Biden for the mess, but pointed a finger at Trump too. 

She argued on CBS This Morning that the Trump administration negotiated a 'surrender agreement.' 

'It was a document that had a date certain for our withdrawal, it released - it committed to prisoner releases - and we were old told, the American people were told, that the Taliban was going to renounce Al Qaeda, of course that didn't happen,' Cheney said. 

She said that when the Trump administration dealt directly with the Taliban it 'delegitimized' the Afghan government. 

She said the Trump administration negotiated with a 'terrorist organization' by talking to the Taliban, and said those talked 'strengthened' the group. 

'We were going to invite the Taliban to Camp David, Secretary Pompeo met with the Taliban, first U.S. secretary of State to do that,' she recalled.   

Cheney then indicated that Biden, however, should get the bulk of the blame.  

'But ultimately this decision to completely and totally withdraw is Joe Biden's - and it is one that is disgraceful,' Cheney said. 

'After 20 years, I’ve learned the hard way that there was never a good time to withdraw U.S. forces': Read Biden's address to the nation on Afghanistan in full 

 Good afternoon. I want to speak today to the unfolding situation in Afghanistan: the developments that have taken place in the last week and the steps we're taking to address the rapidly evolving events.

My national security team and I have been closely monitoring the situation on the ground in Afghanistan and moving quickly to execute the plans we had put in place to respond to every constituency, including -- and contingency -- including the rapid collapse we're seeing now.

I’ll speak more in a moment about the specific steps we're taking, but I want to remind everyone how we got here and what America’s interests are in Afghanistan.

We went to Afghanistan almost 20 years ago with clear goals: get those who attacked us on September 11th, 2001, and make sure al Qaeda could not use Afghanistan as a base from which to attack us again.

We did that. We severely degraded al Qaeda in Afghanistan. We never gave up the hunt for Osama bin Laden, and we got him. That was a decade ago.

Our mission in Afghanistan was never supposed to have been nation building. It was never supposed to be creating a unified, centralized democracy.

Our only vital national interest in Afghanistan remains today what it has always been: preventing a terrorist attack on American homeland.

I've argued for many years that our mission should be narrowly focused on counterterrorism -- not counterinsurgency or nation building. That’s why I opposed the surge when it was proposed in 2009 when I was Vice President.

And that’s why, as President, I am adamant that we focus on the threats we face today in 2021 -- not yesterday's threats.

Today, the terrorist threat has metastasized well beyond Afghanistan: al Shabaab in Somalia, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, al-Nusra in Syria, ISIS attempting to create a caliphate in Syria and Iraq and establishing affiliates in multiple countries in Africa and Asia. These threats warrant our attention and our resources.

We conduct effective counterterrorism missions against terrorist groups in multiple countries where we don’t have a permanent military presence.

If necessary, we will do the same in Afghanistan. We've developed counterterrorism over-the-horizon capability that will allow us to keep our eyes firmly fixed on any direct threats to the United States in the region and to act quickly and decisively if needed.

When I came into office, I inherited a deal that President Trump negotiated with the Taliban. Under his agreement, U.S. forces would be out of Afghanistan by May 1, 2021 -- just a little over three months after I took office.

U.S. forces had already drawn down during the Trump administration from roughly 15,500 American forces to 2,500 troops in country, and the Taliban was at its strongest militarily since 2001.

The choice I had to make, as your President, was either to follow through on that agreement or be prepared to go back to fighting the Taliban in the middle of the spring fighting season.

There would have been no ceasefire after May 1. There was no agreement protecting our forces after May 1. There was no status quo of stability without American casualties after May 1.

There was only the cold reality of either following through on the agreement to withdraw our forces or escalating the conflict and sending thousands more American troops back into combat in Afghanistan, lurching into the third decade of conflict.

I stand squarely behind my decision. After 20 years, I’ve learned the hard way that there was never a good time to withdraw U.S. forces.

That’s why we were still there. We were clear-eyed about the risks. We planned for every contingency.

But I always promised the American people that I will be straight with you. The truth is: This did unfold more quickly than we had anticipated.

So what's happened? Afghanistan political leaders gave up and fled the country. The Afghan military collapsed, sometimes without trying to fight.

If anything, the developments of the past week reinforced that ending U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan now was the right decision.

American troops cannot and should not be fighting in a war and dying in a war that Afghan forces are not willing to fight for themselves. We spent over a trillion dollars. We trained and equipped an Afghan military force of some 300,000 strong -- incredibly well equipped -- a force larger in size than the militaries of many of our NATO allies.

We gave them every tool they could need. We paid their salaries, provided for the maintenance of their air force -- something the Taliban doesn't have. Taliban does not have an air force. We provided close air support.

We gave them every chance to determine their own future. What we could not provide them was the will to fight for that future.

There’s some very brave and capable Afghan special forces units and soldiers, but if Afghanistan is unable to mount any real resistance to the Taliban now, there is no chance that 1 year -- 1 more year, 5 more years, or 20 more years of U.S. military boots on the ground would’ve made any difference.

And here’s what I believe to my core: It is wrong to order American troops to step up when Afghanistan's own armed forces would not. If the political leaders of Afghanistan were unable to come together for the good of their people, unable to negotiate for the future of their country when the chips were down, they would never have done so while U.S. troops remained in Afghanistan bearing the brunt of the fighting for them.

And our true strategic competitors -- China and Russia -- would love nothing more than the United States to continue to funnel billions of dollars in resources and attention into stabilizing Afghanistan indefinitely.

When I hosted President Ghani and Chairman Abdullah at the White House in June and again when I spoke by phone to Ghani in July, we had very frank conversations. We talked about how Afghanistan should prepare to fight their civil wars after the U.S. military departed, to clean up the corruption in government so the government could function for the Afghan people. We talked extensively about the need for Afghan leaders to unite politically.

They failed to do any of that.

I also urged them to engage in diplomacy, to seek a political settlement with the Taliban. This advice was flatly refused. Mr. Ghani insisted the Afghan forces would fight, but obviously he was wrong.

So I'm left again to ask of those who argue that we should stay: How many more generations of America's daughters and sons would you have me send to fight Afghans -- Afghanistan’s civil war when Afghan troops will not? How many more lives -- American lives -- is it worth? How many endless rows of headstones at Arlington National Cemetery?

I'm clear on my answer: I will not repeat the mistakes we’ve made in the past -- the mistake of staying and fighting indefinitely in a conflict that is not in the national interest of the United States, of doubling down on a civil war in a foreign country, of attempting to remake a country through the endless military deployments of U.S. forces.

Those are the mistakes we cannot continue to repeat, because we have significant vital interests in the world that we cannot afford to ignore.

I also want to acknowledge how painful this is to so many of us. The scenes we’re seeing in Afghanistan, they’re gut-wrenching, particularly for our veterans, our diplomats, humanitarian workers, for anyone who has spent time on the ground working to support the Afghan people.

For those who have lost loved ones in Afghanistan and for Americans who have fought and served in the country -- serve our country in Afghanistan -- this is deeply, deeply personal.

It is for me as well. I’ve worked on these issues as long as anyone. I’ve been throughout Afghanistan during this war -- while the war was going on -- from Kabul to Kandahar to the Kunar Valley.

I’ve traveled there on four different occasions. I met with the people. I’ve spoken to the leaders. I spent time with our troops. And I came to understand firsthand what was and was not possible in Afghanistan.

So, now we’re fercus -- focused on what is possible.

We will continue to support the Afghan people. We will lead with our diplomacy, our international influence, and our humanitarian aid.

We’ll continue to push for regional diplomacy and engagement to prevent violence and instability.

We’ll continue to speak out for the basic rights of the Afghan people -- of women and girls -- just as we speak out all over the world.

I have been clear that human rights must be the center of our foreign policy, not the periphery. But the way to do it is not through endless military deployments; it’s with our diplomacy, our economic tools, and rallying the world to join us.

Now, let me lay out the current mission in Afghanistan. I was asked to authorize -- and I did -- 6,000 U.S. troops to deploy to Afghanistan for the purpose of assisting in the departure of U.S. and Allied civilian personnel from Afghanistan, and to evacuate our Afghan allies and vulnerable Afghans to safety outside of Afghanistan.

Our troops are working to secure the airfield and to ensure continued operation of both the civilian and military flights. We’re taking over air traffic control.

We have safely shut down our embassy and transferred our diplomats. Our dip- -- our diplomatic presence is now consolidated at the airport as well.

Over the coming days, we intend to transport out thousands of American citizens who have been living and working in Afghanistan.

We’ll also continue to support the safe departure of civilian personnel -- the civilian personnel of our Allies who are still serving in Afghanistan.

Operation Allies Refugee , which I announced back in July, has already moved 2,000 Afghans who are eligible for Special Immigration Visas and their families to the United States.

In the coming days, the U.S. military will provide assistance to move more SIV-eligible Afghans and their families out of Afghanistan.

We’re also expanding refugee access to cover other vulnerable Afghans who worked for our embassy: U.S. non-governmental agencies -- or the U.S. non-governmental organizations; and Afghans who otherwise are at great risk; and U.S. news agencies.

I know that there are concerns about why we did not begin evacuating Afghans -- civilians sooner. Part of the answer is some of the Afghans did not want to leave earlier -- still hopeful for their country. And part of it was because the Afghan government and its supporters discouraged us from organizing a mass exodus to avoid triggering, as they said, “a crisis of confidence."

American troops are performing this mission as professionally and as effectively as they always do, but it is not without risks.

As we carry out this departure, we have made it clear to the Taliban: If they attack our personnel or disrupt our operation, the U.S. presence will be swift and the response will be swift and forceful. We will defend our people with devastating force if necessary.

Our current military mission will be short in time, limited in scope, and focused in its objectives: Get our people and our allies to safety as quickly as possible.

And once we have completed this mission, we will conclude our military withdrawal. We will end America’s longest war after 20 long years of bloodshed.

The events we're seeing now are sadly proof that no amount of military force would ever deliver a stable, united, and secure Afghanistan -- as known in history as the “graveyard of empires.”

What is happening now could just as easily have happened 5 years ago or 15 years in the future. We have to be honest: Our mission in Afghanistan has taken many missteps -- made many missteps over the past two decades.

I'm now the fourth American President to preside over war in Afghanistan -- two Democrats and two Republicans. I will not pass this responsibly on -- responsibility on to a fifth President.

I will not mislead the American people by claiming that just a little more time in Afghanistan will make all the difference. Nor will I shrink from my share of responsibility for where we are today and how we must move forward from here.

I am President of the United States of America, and the buck stops with me.

I am deeply saddened by the facts we now face. But I do not regret my decision to end America’s warfighting in Afghanistan and maintain a laser-focus on our counterterrorism missions there and in other parts of the world.

Our mission to degrade the terrorist threat of al Qaeda in Afghanistan and kill Osama bin Laden was a success.

Our decades-long effort to overcome centuries of history and permanently change and remake Afghanistan was not, and I wrote and believed it never could be.

I cannot and I will not ask our troops to fight on endlessly in another -- in another country’s civil war, taking casualties, suffering life-shattering injuries, leaving families broken by grief and loss.

This is not in our national security interest. It is not what the American people want. It is not what our troops, who have sacrificed so much over the past two decades, deserve.

I made a commitment to the American people when I ran for President that I would bring America’s military involvement in Afghanistan to an end. And while it’s been hard and messy -- and yes, far from perfect -- I've honored that commitment.

More importantly, I made a commitment to the brave men and women who serve this nation that I wasn't going to ask them to continue to risk their lives in a military action that should have ended long ago.

Our leaders did that in Vietnam when I got here as a young man. I will not do it in Afghanistan.

I know my decision will be criticized, but I would rather take all that criticism than pass this decision on to another President of the United States -- yet another one -- a fifth one.

Because it’s the right one -- it's the right decision for our people. The right one for our brave service members who have risked their lives serving our nation. And it’s the right one for America.

So, thank you. May God protect our troops, our diplomats, and all of the brave Americans serving in harm’s way. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Biden's statement 'washing hands' of Afghanistan 'is one of most shameful in US history': Left and right-wing media unite in condemnation of America's 'chaotic retreat' and 'betrayal' of Afghan people 

Media outlets across the political divide in the US and Britain have united in their condemnation over Joe Biden's handling of the Afghanistan crisis amid what is being billed the biggest foreign policy catastrophe in 65 years.

Even Left-wing outlets such as CNN and The New York Times that would traditionally back a Democrat president have hit out at Mr Biden for his role in allowing insurgents to take Kabul after routing Afghan forces in just a week.

The Wall Street Journal condemned Joe Biden's statement 'washing his hands' of the situation, saying it should 'go down as one of the most shameful in history by a Commander in Chief at such a moment of American retreat'.

As the crisis deepened, a CNN columnist said the 'debacle of the US defeat and chaotic retreat in Afghanistan' was a 'political disaster' for the US President and slammed his 'failure to orchestrate an urgent and orderly exit'. 

And an opinion writer in The Atlantic said there was enough blame attached for the Afghanistan crisis to 'fill a library of books', condemning the 'betrayal' of the Afghan people as he placed the 'burden of shame' on Mr Biden. 

Meanwhile a New York Post editorial said Mr Biden's claims that he 'inherited' his predecessor Donald Trump's withdrawal plans were a 'lie' and the situation is 'as humiliating an end as the rooftop scramble in Saigon in 1975'. 

An opinion piece in The New York Times claimed that Mr Biden would 'go down in history, fairly or unfairly, as the president who presided over a long-brewing, humiliating final act in the American experiment in Afghanistan'. 

A Washington Post column said the situation 'is on Biden, and it will leave an indelible stain on his presidency', while a piece in USA Today said 'this catastrophe is appearing on his watch, and he will have to take his lumps'. 

Fox News ran a comment from Republican Senator Joni Ernst condemning the 'slap in the face to the thousands of men and women who served in this war' and a 'total abandonment of a country and its people' by Mr Biden. 

Columnists in the British Press also hit out at Mr Biden today, with The Sun's editorial saying he 'ignored repeated warnings, then withdrew crucial air support for the Afghan army it has spent billions arming over 20 years'.

Commons Foreign Affairs Committee chair Tom Tugendhat wrote in The Times that it was the 'the biggest foreign policy disaster since Suez' in 1957, while a columnist for the i condemned the 'betrayal of Afghanistan's people'.

The Financial Times said the 'abandonment of Afghanistan raises doubts over the depth of US commitment to supposed allies', while Mark Almond wrote in the Daily Mail that Islamist fundamentalism is now 'back on a roll'. 

People flee as smoke rises after fighting between the Taliban and Afghan security personnel in Kandahar, Afghanistan

People flee as smoke rises after fighting between the Taliban and Afghan security personnel in Kandahar, Afghanistan

It comes as least five people were killed at Kabul Airport and three stowaways reportedly fell to their deaths from one airborne plane as thousands of Afghans try to get on flights out amid increasingly chaotic scenes.

The Taliban swept into the capital yesterday after the Western-backed government collapsed and President Ashraf Ghani fled, ending a two-decade campaign in which the US and its allies had tried to transform the country.

'The burden of shame falls on President Joe Biden': US media reacts to Afghanistan crisis

Wall Street Journal opinion piece by The Editorial Board

'President Biden's statement on Saturday washing his hands of Afghanistan deserves to go down as one of the most shameful in history by a Commander in Chief at such a moment of American retreat.'

CNN analysis by Stephen Collinson

'The debacle of the US defeat and chaotic retreat in Afghanistan is a political disaster for Joe Biden, whose failure to orchestrate an urgent and orderly exit will further rock a presidency plagued by crises and stain his legacy.' 

George Packer in The Atlantic

'The Biden administration failed to heed the warnings on Afghanistan, failed to act with urgency—and its failure has left tens of thousands of Afghans to a terrible fate. This betrayal will live in infamy. The burden of shame falls on President Joe Biden.'

New York Post editorial

'President Biden says he 'inherited' President Trump's withdrawal plans, but that is a lie. He could have taken more time, tried to at least secure the capital, and left a small peacekeeping force. Instead, we pulled out in the dead of night, so quickly we had to send troops back just to make sure our embassy was safely evacuated. It's as humiliating an end as the rooftop scramble in Saigon in 1975.'

David E. Sanger in the New York Times

'Mr Biden will go down in history, fairly or unfairly, as the president who presided over a long-brewing, humiliating final act in the American experiment in Afghanistan.'

Max Boot, columnist for the Washington Post

'Strengthened by the copious U.S. weaponry they have captured — and by the prestige that comes with having humbled a superpower — the Taliban will now be more dangerous than ever. This is on Biden, and it will leave an indelible stain on his presidency.'

Paul Brandus, opinion columnist in USA Today

'Biden is in charge now, this catastrophe is appearing on his watch, and he will have to take his lumps. That's the way it goes. Life, and politics, are often unfair. Yet as bad as things look for Biden today, I wonder just how much long-term damage this will actually do to him.'

Kyle Smith in the New York Post

'The utterly nauseating and unnecessary abandonment of Afghanistan to its fate recalls a similar humiliation at the hands of Islamist radicals in the Jimmy Carter administration. President Biden's profligate spending policies are unleashing inflation that is sparking voter distrust so noticeable that even NPR is sounding the alarm.'

Trey Gowdy on Fox News

'We're just weeks away from the 20th anniversary of the September 11 attacks on our country. Three thousand lives were taken that day. Thousands of lives taken that day and thousands of lives have been lost since in defense of our nation. Tens of thousands of our sons and daughters have been injured. And more than a trillion dollars of your money has been spent in Afghanistan alone. And we are left to wonder why.'

Senator Joni Ernst on Fox News

'The rushed and haphazard withdrawal of US forces in Afghanistan is not the 'strategic shift' President Biden sold to the American people. Instead, it's a total abandonment of a country and its people – and a gift to the Taliban.' 

The US Embassy has been evacuated and the American flag lowered, with diplomats relocating to the airport in scenes reminiscent of the evacuation of the embassy of Saigon in 1975. Other Western nations have also closed their missions and are flying out staff and civilians.

Almost all major checkpoints in Kabul were under Taliban control by this morning and Afghanistan's Civil Aviation Authority issued an advisory saying the 'civilian side' of the airport had been 'closed until further notice' and that the military controlled the airspace. 

Condemning the comments of Mr Biden in recent days, a Wall Street Journal opinion piece by 'The Editorial Board' said today: 'President Biden's statement on Saturday washing his hands of Afghanistan deserves to go down as one of the most shameful in history by a Commander in Chief at such a moment of American retreat. 

'As the Taliban closed in on Kabul, Mr Biden sent a confirmation of US abandonment that absolved himself of responsibility, deflected blame to his predecessor, and more or less invited the Taliban to take over the country.'

It added that Mr Biden's 'Saturday self-justification exemplifies his righteous dishonesty'. The President had said: 'One more year, or five more years, of US military presence would not have made a difference if the Afghan military cannot or will not hold its own country.'

But the WSJ claimed: 'Afghans were willing to fight and take casualties with the support of the US and its NATO allies, especially air power. A few thousand troops and contractors could have done the job and prevented this rout.'

Analysis published on CNN's website by Stephen Collinson stated that the 'debacle of the US defeat and chaotic retreat in Afghanistan is a political disaster for Joe Biden', adding that his 'failure to orchestrate an urgent and orderly exit will further rock a presidency plagued by crises and stain his legacy'.

Mr Collinson continued: 'A stunning Taliban blitzkrieg followed more than 20 years of US and allied policy failures, misunderstandings of Afghan politics and culture, public war fatigue and the culpability and corruption of the failed state's leaders.

'And while Biden's political and geopolitical rivals rush to exploit his mistakes, the true magnitude of the crisis can only be judged in the human tragedy of a people again subject to Taliban persecution. 

'And a failure to fulfill the now apparently near-impossible tasks of evacuating all the Afghan translators, workers and fixers on whom the US relied and who now face Taliban retribution would besmirch America's conscience and global reputation.'

Meanwhile George Packer in The Atlantic said there was 'plenty of blame to go around for the 20-year debacle in Afghanistan - enough to fill a library of books'. 

He continued: 'Perhaps the effort to rebuild the country was doomed from the start. But our abandonment of the Afghans who helped us, counted on us, staked their lives on us, is a final, gratuitous shame that we could have avoided. 

'The Biden administration failed to heed the warnings on Afghanistan, failed to act with urgency—and its failure has left tens of thousands of Afghans to a terrible fate. This betrayal will live in infamy. The burden of shame falls on President Joe Biden.'

And a New York Post editorial accused the President of misleading the public, saying: 'President Biden says he 'inherited' President Trump's withdrawal plans, but that is a lie. 

'He could have taken more time, tried to at least secure the capital, and left a small peacekeeping force. Instead, we pulled out in the dead of night, so quickly we had to send troops back just to make sure our embassy was safely evacuated. It's as humiliating an end as the rooftop scramble in Saigon in 1975.'

Elsewhere in the New York Post, columnist Kyle Smith wrote: 'The utterly nauseating and unnecessary abandonment of Afghanistan to its fate recalls a similar humiliation at the hands of Islamist radicals in the Jimmy Carter administration.

'President Biden's profligate spending policies are unleashing inflation that is sparking voter distrust so noticeable that even NPR is sounding the alarm.'

In the New York Times, David E. Sanger stated: 'Rarely in modern presidential history have words come back to bite an American commander in chief as swiftly as these from President Biden a little more than five weeks ago.'

He quoted Mr Biden saying: 'There's going to be no circumstance where you see people being lifted off the roof of an embassy of the United States in Afghanistan.' The President added: 'The likelihood there's going to be the Taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country is highly unlikely.'

'The biggest foreign policy disaster since Suez': Commentators react in the British Press 

Nick Timothy in the Daily Telegraph

'It is ludicrous to think Britain – alone or in concert with all the militaries of Europe – could or should have fought a new Afghan war alone. First Donald Trump did a deal with the Taliban promising the withdrawal of troops by May this year. Then President Biden declared he had 'zero responsibility' to Afghanistan, insisting his sole obligation was 'to protect America's national self-interest'. As his predecessor might have put it: America first.'

Tom Tugendhat in The Times

'The fall of Kabul is the biggest foreign policy disaster since Suez. The operation to seize the canal in 1956 symbolised the end of Britain's global ambition and refocused us on Nato and alliances. It showed conclusively that the US could limit our actions and change our policy.'

Mark Almond in the Daily Mail

'What makes this debacle different from the Americans' hasty retreat from Saigon in 1975 is the existence across the West of small cells of radical Islamists who will be inspired by our humiliating retreat from Kabul. There were no Vietcong cells in London waiting to be activated then. Today things are different. The humiliation of the West in Afghanistan has set Islamist fundamentalism back on a roll.'

Simon Tisdall in the Guardian

'What will it take for Joe Biden to admit he is disastrously wrong about Afghanistan? The US leader struck a defiant pose last week. Sounding like a slightly desperate Olympics coach, he told Afghans it was their country. If they want it, they have to fight for it. In American politics-speak, this is called tough love. Without the love.' 

Ian Birrell in the i

'The withdrawal, begun by a Republican president and speeded up by his Democratic successor, is driven by domestic concerns rather than the slightest consideration for people they are leaving to suffer. It is a betrayal of Afghanistan's people, of our wider strategic interests and all those troops killed or maimed fighting for its future.'

Financial Times editorial

'A desire in the White House to wrap up nagging foreign policy problems so it can focus on China is understandable. But the abandonment of Afghanistan raises doubts over the depth of US commitment to supposed allies, and its determination to see military entanglements through to the bitter end.'

Leo McKinstry in the Daily Express

'Over the last 20 years, Britain is estimated to have spent almost £40billion in Afghanistan, while 456 of our brave personnel have lost their lives in the struggle, yet those heroic sacrifices tragically look like they were made in vain.'

The Sun editorial

'Biden ignored repeated warnings, then withdrew crucial air support for the Afghan army it has spent billions arming over 20 years. It was an action which borders on the criminal. A total and unnecessary moral failure which left Britain powerless.'

And Mr Sanger wrote: 'Mr Biden will go down in history, fairly or unfairly, as the president who presided over a long-brewing, humiliating final act in the American experiment in Afghanistan. 

'After seven months in which his administration seemed to exude much-needed competence — getting more than 70 per cent of the country's adults vaccinated, engineering surging job growth and making progress toward a bipartisan infrastructure bill — everything about America's last days in Afghanistan shattered the imagery.'

Max Boot, columnist for the Washington Post, said that pundits including him 'love to praise bipartisanship in public policy', but that the the 'calamity in Afghanistan shows the dark side of bipartisanship'.

He said it was a 'disaster that was produced by four administrations, two Republican (George W. Bush, Donald Trump) and two Democratic (Barack Obama, Joe Biden)'.

Mr Boot continued: 'But while 20 years of mistakes had a cumulative impact, there was nothing inevitable about the outcome: The Taliban takeover of Afghanistan less than a month before the 20th anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. 

'Strengthened by the copious U.S. weaponry they have captured - and by the prestige that comes with having humbled a superpower - the Taliban will now be more dangerous than ever. This is on Biden, and it will leave an indelible stain on his presidency.' 

And Paul Brandus, an opinion columnist in USA Today, pointed out that he did not expect the long-term impacts on Mr Biden to be as severe as might be suggested.

He wrote: 'Biden is in charge now, this catastrophe is appearing on his watch, and he will have to take his lumps. That's the way it goes. Life, and politics, are often unfair. 

'Yet as bad as things look for Biden today, I wonder just how much long-term damage this will actually do to him. In late April 1975, as the Vietcong and North Vietnamese Army closed in on Saigon, Ford's Gallup approval stood at 39 per cent – he had been hammered by his post-Watergate pardon of Nixon – yet by the end of June, just two months later, it was 52 per cent.

'Americans were sick of Vietnam, at the time the longest war in American history, and the president said enough was enough. Ford's election bid the next year failed, but it wasn't because of his refusal to go back into Vietnam. The pardon and a rough economy did him in.'

Over on Fox News, Republican Senator Joni Ernst said: 'The rushed and haphazard withdrawal of U.S. forces in Afghanistan is not the 'strategic shift' President Biden sold to the American people. Instead, it's a total abandonment of a country and its people – and a gift to the Taliban.

'What the world could soon witness is a nation controlled by the same bloodthirsty terrorists that sponsored Usama bin Laden, Al Qaeda and the attacks on our homeland 20 years ago. It is a slap in the face to the thousands of men and women who served in this war.'

And Sunday Night in America host Trey Gowdy said on his Fox News show last night: 'We're just weeks away from the 20th anniversary of the September 11 attacks on our country. Three thousand lives were taken that day. 

'Thousands of lives taken that day and thousands of lives have been lost since in defense of our nation. Tens of thousands of our sons and daughters have been injured. And more than a trillion dollars of your money has been spent in Afghanistan alone. And we are left to wonder why.' 

In the British Press, Tom Tugendhat in The Times said the fall of Kabul was the 'biggest foreign policy disaster since Suez'. 

He added: 'The operation to seize the canal in 1956 symbolised the end of Britain's global ambition and refocused us on Nato and alliances. It showed conclusively that the US could limit our actions and change our policy.

'The fall of Kabul will be remembered for similar reasons: not just its abject failure, but also because it revealed the nature of US power and our inability to hold a separate line. 

'The redeployment of 2,500 US troops, half as many as it takes to crew a carrier, ended 20 years of British effort in Afghanistan and left thousands of British citizens under Taliban jurisdiction.'

Defence Secretary admits 'some people won't get back' from Afghanistan 

Defence Secretary Ben Wallace has admitted 'some people won't get back' from Afghanistan as a desperate struggle to get UK nationals and local allies out of the country continued.

Mr Wallace, who previously served in the Scots Guards, appeared to choke up while appearing on the LBC radio station this morning as he spoke about the evacuation effort from the country, which has fallen to the Taliban following the withdrawal of Western troops.

British troops are racing against the clock to get remaining UK nationals and their local allies out of Afghanistan following the dramatic fall of the country's Western-backed government. But becoming emotional while speaking to LBC, Mr Wallace spoke of his regret that 'some people won't get back'.

He said: 'It's a really deep part of regret for me ... look, some people won't get back. Some people won't get back and we will have to do our best in third countries to process those people.'

Asked why he felt the situation 'so personally', Mr Wallace replied: 'Because I'm a soldier... because it's sad and the West has done what it's done, we have to do our very best to get people out and stand by our obligations and 20 years of sacrifice is what it is.'

Lead elements of 16 Air Assault Brigade were working with US forces to secure Kabul airport to ensure flights can continue as Afghans and foreigners alike scramble to leave.

The first flight of British nationals and embassy staff arrived at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire last night, the Ministry of Defence confirmed.

Mr Wallace said the barrier to helping more people leave the country was how quickly they could be processed. 

Kabul airport has so far not come under attack but there are fears that could change quickly with Taliban insurgents now effectively in control of the capital.

In The Daily Telegraph, blame was attached to America, with Nick Timothy writing: 'It is ludicrous to think Britain – alone or in concert with all the militaries of Europe – could or should have fought a new Afghan war alone. 

'First Donald Trump did a deal with the Taliban promising the withdrawal of troops by May this year. Then President Biden declared he had 'zero responsibility' to Afghanistan, insisting his sole obligation was 'to protect America's national self-interest'. As his predecessor might have put it: America first.'

He added: 'This is a humiliating defeat. But if withdrawal was inevitable, its manner was not. By planning earlier, or withdrawing later, the allies could have given themselves time to evacuate their nationals safely, and establish a co-ordinated resettlement scheme for vulnerable Afghans including those who had worked with Western militaries, embassies and aid organisations.'

Meanwhile Mark Almond wrote in the Daily Mail: 'What makes this debacle different from the Americans' hasty retreat from Saigon in 1975 is the existence across the West of small cells of radical Islamists who will be inspired by our humiliating retreat from Kabul.

There were no Vietcong cells in London waiting to be activated then. Today things are different. The humiliation of the West in Afghanistan has set Islamist fundamentalism back on a roll. 

Writing in the Guardian yesterday, Simon Tisdall said: 'What will it take for Joe Biden to admit he is disastrously wrong about Afghanistan? The US leader struck a defiant pose last week. 

'Sounding like a slightly desperate Olympics coach, he told Afghans it was their country. If they want it, they have to fight for it. In American politics-speak, this is called tough love. Without the love.' 

And Ian Birrell said in the i that the Taliban resurgence was 'the latest dismal chapter in the woeful recent history of Western intervention', adding: 'The United States foolishly set a date for departure.'

He continued: 'The withdrawal, begun by a Republican president and speeded up by his Democratic successor, is driven by domestic concerns rather than the slightest consideration for people they are leaving to suffer. It is a betrayal of Afghanistan's people, of our wider strategic interests and all those troops killed or maimed fighting for its future.'

The Financial Times editorial was also scathing of the American response. It said: 'A desire in the White House to wrap up nagging foreign policy problems so it can focus on China is understandable.

'But the abandonment of Afghanistan raises doubts over the depth of US commitment to supposed allies, and its determination to see military entanglements through to the bitter end. As one of the north Atlantic alliance's biggest and most costly foreign policy priorities of this century implodes, those lessons will not be lost on Beijing.'

US troops fired shots into the air at Kabul Airport today as Afghans climbed up the outside of airbridges trying to flee

US troops fired shots into the air at Kabul Airport today as Afghans climbed up the outside of airbridges trying to flee

A

The US Embassy has been evacuated and the American flag lowered, with diplomats relocating to the airport in scenes reminiscent of the evacuation of the embassy of Saigon in 1975. Other Western countries have also closed their missions and are flying out staff and civilians after the Taliban walked into Kabul's presidential palace

The US Embassy has been evacuated and the American flag lowered, with diplomats relocating to the airport in scenes reminiscent of the evacuation of the embassy of Saigon in 1975. Other Western countries have also closed their missions and are flying out staff and civilians after the Taliban walked into Kabul's presidential palace

And Leo McKinstry in the Daily Express looked at the figures involved, saying: 'Over the last 20 years, Britain is estimated to have spent almost £40billion in Afghanistan, while 456 of our brave personnel have lost their lives in the struggle, yet those heroic sacrifices tragically look like they were made in vain.'

Finally, in The Sun's editorial, the newspaper said: 'We pray our 600 hero Paras can safely evacuate the 4,000 UK citizens and allies without further violence. Enough British blood has been spilt. But what a pitiful, shaming and humiliating sight it will prove to be.

'Having made the disastrous decision to pull out, Sleepy Joe Biden and his administration were caught napping by the speed of the Taliban advance. Failure to realise Afghan cities would fall so quickly was a monumental error by US intelligence.

'Biden ignored repeated warnings, then withdrew crucial air support for the Afghan army it has spent billions arming over 20 years. It was an action which borders on the criminal. A total and unnecessary moral failure which left Britain powerless.'

Popular posts from this blog

Study Abroad USA, College of Charleston, Popular Courses, Alumni

Thinking for Study Abroad USA. School of Charleston, the wonderful grounds is situated in the actual middle of a verifiable city - Charleston. Get snatched up by the wonderful and customary engineering, beautiful pathways, or look at the advanced steel and glass building which houses the School of Business. The grounds additionally gives students simple admittance to a few major tech organizations like Amazon's CreateSpace, Google, TwitPic, and so on. The school offers students nearby as well as off-grounds convenience going from completely outfitted home lobbies to memorable homes. It is prepared to offer different types of assistance and facilities like clubs, associations, sporting exercises, support administrations, etc. To put it plainly, the school grounds is rising with energy and there will never be a dull second for students at the College of Charleston. Concentrate on Abroad USA is improving and remunerating for your future. The energetic grounds likewise houses various

Best MBA Online Colleges in the USA

“Opportunities never open, instead we create them for us”. Beginning with this amazing saying, let’s unbox today’s knowledge. Love Business and marketing? Want to make a high-paid career in business administration? Well, if yes, then mate, we have got you something amazing to do!   We all imagine an effortless future with a cozy house and a laptop. Well, well! You can make this happen. Today, with this guide, we will be exploring some of the top-notch online MBA universities and institutes in the USA. Let’s get started! Why learn Online MBA from the USA? Access to More Options This online era has given a second chance to children who want to reflect on their careers while managing their hectic schedules. In this, the internet has played a very crucial in rejuvenating schools, institutes, and colleges to give the best education to students across the globe. Graduating with Less Debt Regular classes from high reputed institutes often charge heavy tuition fees. However onl

Sickening moment maskless 'Karen' COUGHS in the face of grocery store customer, then claims she doesn't have to wear a mask because she 'isn't sick'

A woman was captured on camera following a customer through a supermarket as she coughs on her after claiming she does not need a mask because she is not sick.  Video of the incident, which has garnered hundreds of thousands of views on Twitter alone, allegedly took place in a Su per Saver in Lincoln, Nebraska according to Twitter user @davenewworld_2. In it, an unidentified woman was captured dramatically coughing as she smiles saying 'Excuse me! I'm coming through' in the direction of the customer recording her. Scroll down for video An unidentified woman was captured dramatically coughing as she smiles saying 'Excuse me! I'm coming through' in the direction of a woman recording her A woman was captured on camera following a customer as she coughs on her in a supermarket without a mask on claiming she does not need one because she is not sick @chaiteabugz #karen #covid #karens #karensgonewild #karensalert #masks we were just wearing a mask at the store. ¿ o