Skip to main content

Eva Rausing death: Did we kill her through our toleration of her ghastly addiction?

/li> Tragic: Philanthropist Eva Rausing was found dead in her London home earlier this week

Eva Rausing got hooked on drugs when she was a teenager. She dropped out of university because of her drug habit. Money was her doom. She had the chance of rehab whenever she wanted it – a chance that only 2 per cent of drug addicts in this country get (despite the billions that government still ploughs into methadone  treatment).  The money was always there to finance her destructive habit - indefinitely. 

Worse, there was, apparently, no one or no situation that checked her behaviour. It went sanctioned. There was no criminal challenge. No wake up call.

Whether she died of a suspected drug overdose or of heart failure hardly matters. It is reasonable to say that drugs and her drug lifestyle – a lifestyle that invites every other risk - was more than a contributory factor.

She and her husband Hans ostensibly came to London to avoid high Swedish Taxes.  But in London they were also able pursue a drug addled hedonistic lifestyle that simply would not have been tolerated in Sweden.

This lifestyle and notoriety had not stopped her, by the time of her death, from being  a co-patron with Kate Middleton of the drug charity, Action on Addiction. It had not stopped her from being a trustee of one of Prince Charles’s charities.  She was hardly fit for either task. But neither charity, apparently, had asked her to step down. 

It is impossible to believe that since she was caught three years ago taking crack cocaine into the US Embassy that no one suspected what has been going on since, not least given her Face Book cries for help and her haggard appearance.  Her routine bag search then revealed 2.5 grams of heroin and 10 grams of crack cocaine in her purse.

The police were called by the Embassy.  A further search of the couple’s SW1 home turned up thousands of dollars’ worth of pure cocaine as well as more crack and heroin.

  More... Tetra Pak billionaire Hans Rausing arrested on suspicion of murdering his American wife found dead in £70m London home Shocking video: Watch as the dishevelled and unsteady Rausings stumble around in the street on camera just weeks before death

Though the drugs the Rausings had on them would have earned a street dealer a decent spell of time at Her Majesty’s pleasure, all charges against these billionaires were suddenly dropped. This came  after a “protracted correspondence” between their lawyers and the Crown Prosecution Service.

Instead they were issued with a conditional caution.

The decision, rightly, was slammed by Sir Ian Blair, then head of London’s police force.  He was “very surprised” that they escaped prosecution, but remained ridiculously powerless. He said the decision sent out the wrong message about drug use.

Public: Eva's addiction became public when she attempted to smuggle heroine into the US Embassy and was subsequently cautioned

He said: 'I do find that result extremely surprising and it reminds me of the 19th century legal comment often attributed to Sir James Mathew, "in England justice is open to all - just like the Ritz".'

It certainly shouted one law for the rich and one for the poor as I remember blogging on the Centre for Policy Studies website at the time – to the fury of the pro drug lobby.

      More from Kathy Gyngell...   Yes, minister, nurseries ARE bad for children. So why don't you do more for stay-at-home mums? 22/04/13   But why pick on mothers who stay at home? 08/01/13   Teachers are complaining that GCSE English was marked too harshly. But if everyone walks off with an A*, what's the point? 24/08/12   Schools are still spoon-feeding their students. Today’s 'A' Level results must not deter Michael Gove from his exam reforms 16/08/12   Can we trust state schools to spend the money or time allocated to compulsory school sport properly? 14/08/12   Our schools need tough guys teaching teenage boys, not feminised men caring for primary-level infants 17/07/12   It is frankly irresponsible of Ministers to say students must not be put off university for financial reasons 11/07/12   The case for the 11 plus is overwhelming. But how long will it take to learn from the lessons of the past? 06/07/12   VIEW FULL ARCHIVE

Despite the public outrage, Prince Charles was quick to give his public support to Eva Rausing.  His spurious defence was that his charities gave a second chance to young drug addicts. So why not therefore to Mrs. Rausing?  That she already had had endless chances and that they had hardly proved to be the solution to her problem seemed to escape him.

So were no questions asked in the critical years that followed and if not why not?

Like John Paul Getty Junior before them, the simple truth is that in libertarian London no one challenged their drug consumption. 

Whether simply lazy or well intentioned, such misplaced kindness represents the worst and the most perverse of contemporary liberal thinking.

And it is not just Prince Charles who is guilty of it.  The great and good in Britain have encouraged such toleration of drugs, from the misguided Archbishop of Canterbury downwards.  Not only has he supported more toleration but is quoted on the back of the Transform Policy Foundation’s “Blueprint" for legalisation. Transform is a lobby funded in part by The Open Society, itself funded by George Soros, that campaigns single mindedly for the legalisation and normalisation of all drugs. 

 The Times and now even the Telegraph have joined with the Independent and Guardian in giving over column inches to ‘open minded’ but misguided libertarians.  These writers would have us believe that the normalisation and legalisation of drugs is a solution to the ghastly addiction that the Rausings fell into without check. It is not.

 

Slipped through: When Eva was cautioned action should have been taken as those were the critical years when we should have questioned her, and her husband's, drug use

If their plight proved anything it is that the law did not touch them  and that legalisation would and could never protect them from the harsh and sordid reality that drug users and addicts fall into.

Wealth did not save the Rausings from living in the squalor we now learn of inside their multi million mansion.  For addicts always want more and in their addiction they destroy everything of real value – nothing more so than trust and relationships. 

Far from detracting from their lifestyle, drugs’ de facto legality plus their affordability and availability aided it. It added years to their denial, their deceit and to their loss of moral compass and sense of responsibility,  all that make up the condition of addiction. 

It staved off the crises that have brought other addicts to their senses sooner. Prison, as it has been with so many others, might have been the making of them.

It was not rehab that failed Eva Rausing.  Thousands of others have benefited from it – many of whom got there by route of prison or arrest.   These are people  who today are running banks, businesses or  are actively putting back through counselling , mentoring  and helping others break their cycle of addiction. 

Loss: Eva and Hans Kristian Rausing were not saved by rehab and were destroyed by our toleration

Recovered addicts have their antennae tuned for denial a mile off.  They are the toughest of task masters.  They demand honesty in relationships and warn against the disastrous type of  ‘co-dependency’ of the Rausings mutually destructive relationship.

The thousands of addicts who understand this have not only gone through rehab but continue to attend their regular AA, NA or CA meetings to keep their lives on track.  They keep in touch with peers who also ‘live the programme’.  As they say, it works.

Unfortunately the Rausings did not get to live the programme.  They were not so lucky.

John Paul Getty was. He fortunately recovered and grew to love the UK.   But Rausings pulled the short straw and were destroyed by our toleration.

 

Follow me on Twitter




Popular posts from this blog

Study Abroad USA, College of Charleston, Popular Courses, Alumni

Thinking for Study Abroad USA. School of Charleston, the wonderful grounds is situated in the actual middle of a verifiable city - Charleston. Get snatched up by the wonderful and customary engineering, beautiful pathways, or look at the advanced steel and glass building which houses the School of Business. The grounds additionally gives students simple admittance to a few major tech organizations like Amazon's CreateSpace, Google, TwitPic, and so on. The school offers students nearby as well as off-grounds convenience going from completely outfitted home lobbies to memorable homes. It is prepared to offer different types of assistance and facilities like clubs, associations, sporting exercises, support administrations, etc. To put it plainly, the school grounds is rising with energy and there will never be a dull second for students at the College of Charleston. Concentrate on Abroad USA is improving and remunerating for your future. The energetic grounds likewise houses various

Best MBA Online Colleges in the USA

“Opportunities never open, instead we create them for us”. Beginning with this amazing saying, let’s unbox today’s knowledge. Love Business and marketing? Want to make a high-paid career in business administration? Well, if yes, then mate, we have got you something amazing to do!   We all imagine an effortless future with a cozy house and a laptop. Well, well! You can make this happen. Today, with this guide, we will be exploring some of the top-notch online MBA universities and institutes in the USA. Let’s get started! Why learn Online MBA from the USA? Access to More Options This online era has given a second chance to children who want to reflect on their careers while managing their hectic schedules. In this, the internet has played a very crucial in rejuvenating schools, institutes, and colleges to give the best education to students across the globe. Graduating with Less Debt Regular classes from high reputed institutes often charge heavy tuition fees. However onl

Sickening moment maskless 'Karen' COUGHS in the face of grocery store customer, then claims she doesn't have to wear a mask because she 'isn't sick'

A woman was captured on camera following a customer through a supermarket as she coughs on her after claiming she does not need a mask because she is not sick.  Video of the incident, which has garnered hundreds of thousands of views on Twitter alone, allegedly took place in a Su per Saver in Lincoln, Nebraska according to Twitter user @davenewworld_2. In it, an unidentified woman was captured dramatically coughing as she smiles saying 'Excuse me! I'm coming through' in the direction of the customer recording her. Scroll down for video An unidentified woman was captured dramatically coughing as she smiles saying 'Excuse me! I'm coming through' in the direction of a woman recording her A woman was captured on camera following a customer as she coughs on her in a supermarket without a mask on claiming she does not need one because she is not sick @chaiteabugz #karen #covid #karens #karensgonewild #karensalert #masks we were just wearing a mask at the store. ¿ o