Skip to main content

The Work Programme, payment by results and the restriction of debate



Debate over today's Work Programme figures should not forget the outsiders, argues Dan Silver. They are central to employment and poverty issues
Share 18




inShare6
Email

Is it working? And can he have a voice on that? An unemployed man at a Work Programme session for long term unemployed people at Pertemps in Hull. Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Guardian

The Coalition Government's Work Programme brings all previous welfare-to-work programmes under the delivery of 18 Prime Contractors, who are commissioned centrally by the Department for Work and Pensions at a potential cost of up to £5 billion.

Initial evidence suggests that large corporations are benefiting the most from these arrangements, whilst smaller specialist providers are left in limbo waiting for referrals.

Until today, figures have not been released which show whether the programme has been a success in terms of getting people into work, and keeping them there – on which the Prime Contractors will receive their payment. There will be much discussion on these figures, and rightly so – the central mechanism of the government's employment policy is finally open to a level of scrutiny we have not yet had.

You can read the Guardian's main story on today's figures and associated links here.

However, there needs to be wider discussion about the very framework that exists for measuring success. At the core of the government's approach to public services and increased focus on outcomes is a model of payment by results. This is a far-reaching programme that is being extended into Welfare to Work, Sure Start centres and offender rehabilitation. Indeed, KPMG contends that it 'should be implemented across the public sector without exception' as a means of reducing bureaucracy, and with the aim of ensuring more responsiveness to the customer due to an incentive structure derived from the seemingly omnipotent market.

Much has been made of the move to payment by results as a supposed antidote for the target driven world of New Labour. However, David Boyle argues that payment by results experience the same difficulties as targets – which are about the 'difficulty of measuring precisely what is most important.' These problems include a technocratic approach to defining the terms of success and effectiveness. Another participant in the Hull session. Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Guardian

This is driven by what appears to be a quite bureaucratic dominance represented by performance measurement. Such an approach to assessment is based disproportionately upon statistical analysis, and neglects inclusive public debate. This focus purely on statistical outcomes means that the most marginalised communities and more difficult-to-place individuals can potentially be neglected, as they could be considered too far away from achieving such results and therefore not financially worth investing resources into supporting - even if there is greater reward.

This is illustrated by today's figures showing that of over 240,000 young people on the Programme, only 2.5% have so far moved into a sustainable job, a figure even worse for people with disabilities.

This is especially problematic as there is no space for deliberation about the social justice issues that this presents, about the efficacy and equity of policy, or the deeper social structures that exist. This contributes to what Jacques Rancière has termed passive equality, in which those outside of the decision-making process are assigned roles as passive objects.

So, the questions we must be asking are not just a case of whether the Work Programme has been successful in placing people in jobs (important as that is). But also, in the knowledge of the fact that the majority of people in poverty are in work, whether or not the current labour market is appropriate for a more just social economy. Such questions need debating beyond the issue of what the government deems to be a result.

Popular posts from this blog

Study Abroad USA, College of Charleston, Popular Courses, Alumni

Thinking for Study Abroad USA. School of Charleston, the wonderful grounds is situated in the actual middle of a verifiable city - Charleston. Get snatched up by the wonderful and customary engineering, beautiful pathways, or look at the advanced steel and glass building which houses the School of Business. The grounds additionally gives students simple admittance to a few major tech organizations like Amazon's CreateSpace, Google, TwitPic, and so on. The school offers students nearby as well as off-grounds convenience going from completely outfitted home lobbies to memorable homes. It is prepared to offer different types of assistance and facilities like clubs, associations, sporting exercises, support administrations, etc. To put it plainly, the school grounds is rising with energy and there will never be a dull second for students at the College of Charleston. Concentrate on Abroad USA is improving and remunerating for your future. The energetic grounds likewise houses various

Best MBA Online Colleges in the USA

“Opportunities never open, instead we create them for us”. Beginning with this amazing saying, let’s unbox today’s knowledge. Love Business and marketing? Want to make a high-paid career in business administration? Well, if yes, then mate, we have got you something amazing to do!   We all imagine an effortless future with a cozy house and a laptop. Well, well! You can make this happen. Today, with this guide, we will be exploring some of the top-notch online MBA universities and institutes in the USA. Let’s get started! Why learn Online MBA from the USA? Access to More Options This online era has given a second chance to children who want to reflect on their careers while managing their hectic schedules. In this, the internet has played a very crucial in rejuvenating schools, institutes, and colleges to give the best education to students across the globe. Graduating with Less Debt Regular classes from high reputed institutes often charge heavy tuition fees. However onl

Sickening moment maskless 'Karen' COUGHS in the face of grocery store customer, then claims she doesn't have to wear a mask because she 'isn't sick'

A woman was captured on camera following a customer through a supermarket as she coughs on her after claiming she does not need a mask because she is not sick.  Video of the incident, which has garnered hundreds of thousands of views on Twitter alone, allegedly took place in a Su per Saver in Lincoln, Nebraska according to Twitter user @davenewworld_2. In it, an unidentified woman was captured dramatically coughing as she smiles saying 'Excuse me! I'm coming through' in the direction of the customer recording her. Scroll down for video An unidentified woman was captured dramatically coughing as she smiles saying 'Excuse me! I'm coming through' in the direction of a woman recording her A woman was captured on camera following a customer as she coughs on her in a supermarket without a mask on claiming she does not need one because she is not sick @chaiteabugz #karen #covid #karens #karensgonewild #karensalert #masks we were just wearing a mask at the store. ¿ o